Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates

Sapna; Sharma, Amit

doi:10.21595/vp.2023.23758

Vibroengineering Procedia

Browse Procedia

Published: 27 November 2023

Check for updates

Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates

Sapna¹

Amit Sharma²

^{1, 2}Amity University Haryana, Gurugram, India

Corresponding Author:

Amit Sharma

Cite the article Download PDF

Downloads 106

Abstract

This study analyzes vibration modes in non-homogeneous orthotropic parallelogram plate with a one-dimensional circular thickness, focusing on SCCC edge condition, where C and S represent the clamped and simply supported edges of the plate, respectively. Circular Poisson’s ratio variation is considered, along with linear temperature changes. The study demonstrates the advantages of variable Poisson’s ratio over density parameter variation in obtaining shorter vibration time periods. Orthotropic parallelogram plate, thermal gradient, circular tapering, nonhomogeneity.

1. Introduction

The analysis of vibrational modes in various plate configurations, including tapered ones, is vital in engineering, given their wide-ranging applications. Numerous studies have contributed to this area.

Di et al. [2] introduced a theory enhancing the accuracy of predicting the behavior of thick orthotropic plates compared to classical lamination and shear deformation theories. Gupta et al. [3] investigated transverse motion in an elastic plate with non-linear thickness and thermal gradient, utilizing the Rayleigh-Ritz technique. Gupta et al. [4] introduced a model for analyzing vibrations in parallelogram-shaped, viscoelastic, orthotropic plates with linear thickness variations in both directions. Khanna [6] used the Rayleigh Ritz method to study frequency modes of a viscoelastic isotropic rectangular plate, considering the impact of thermal gradient. The natural vibration of non-homogeneous tapered parallelogram plates with temperature variation was examined in [8]. Vibrational frequencies in a non-uniformly thick parallelogram plate were mathematically analyzed, considering linear temperature effects by authors in [9]. The influence of thermal effects on non-homogeneous parallelogram plates with two-dimensional circular variations in thickness was explored in a study referenced as [10]. In [11], the authors focused on the vibration of orthotropic square plates with varying thickness, using the Rayleigh-Ritz method and MATLAB software. Sharma et al. [12] examined an orthotropic parallelogram plate with bi-linear thickness variation and a parabolic temperature distribution, specifically focusing on the $S S S S$ edge condition.

This paper investigates the impact of one-dimensional circular tapering, Poisson’s ratio, and linear temperature on vibrational modes in a non-homogeneous orthotropic parallelogram plate under $S C C C$ boundary conditions.

2. Geometry and analytical approach

Consider a nonhomogeneous parallelogram plate depicted in Fig. 1 with dimensions $a$ and $b$ , thickness $l$ , and density $ρ$ .

The skew plate, represented in Fig. 1, has a circular thickness denoted as $l$ in one dimension. Additionally, Poisson’s ratio $ν$ is assumed to be circular in one dimension:

1

l = l_{0} [1 + β (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}})], ν_{ξ} = ν_{ξ_{0}} [1 - m (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}})],

where, $l_{0}$ and $ν_{ξ_{0}}$ stand for the initial thickness and Poisson’s ratio of the plate at the origin. Furthermore, $β$ (ranging from $0$ to $1$ ) and $m$ (ranging from $0$ to $1$ ) represent the taper and non-homogeneity parameters, respectively. We assume a two-dimensional steady-state temperature distribution on the plate, following the parabolic model introduced in [7]:

2

τ = τ_{0} (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b}),

where, $τ$ and $τ_{0}$ denote the temperature excess above the reference temperature at any point on the plate and at the origin, respectively. The temperature dependence modulus of elasticity for engineering structures follows [7]:

3

E_{ξ} (τ) = E_{1} (1 - γ τ), E_{ψ} (τ) = E_{2} (1 - γ τ), G_{ξ ψ} (τ) = G_{0} (1 - γ τ),

where, $E_{ξ}$ and $E_{ψ}$ denote Young’s moduli in the $ξ$ and $ψ$ directions, while ${G_{ξ}}_{ψ}$ represents the shear modulus. The parameter $γ$ accounts for the slope variation of moduli with temperature. By substituting Eq. (2) in Eq. (3), we obtain the following expressions:

4

E_{ξ} (τ) = E_{1} [1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})], E_{ψ} (τ) = E_{2} [1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})],

G_{ξ ψ} (τ) = G_{0} [1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})],

where $α = γ τ_{0}$ , $(0 \leq α < 1)$ is called temperature gradient.

Fig. 1Parallelogram plate having 1-D circular thickness

The flexural rigidities $D_{ξ}$ , $D_{ψ}$ and torsional rigidity $D_{ξ ψ}$ of the plate are taken as in [12]:

5

D_{ξ} = \frac{E_{ξ} l^{3}}{12 (1 - ν_{ξ} ν_{ψ})}, D_{ψ} = \frac{E_{η} l^{3}}{12 (1 - ν_{ξ} ν_{ψ})}, D_{ξ ψ} = \frac{G_{ξ ψ} l^{3}}{12}, D_{1} = ν_{ξ} D_{ψ} = ν_{ψ} D_{ξ},

where $ν_{ξ}$ and $ν_{η}$ are Poisson’s ratios. Using Eqs. (1), (3) and (4) in Eq. (5), we get:

6

D_{ξ} = \frac{E_{1} h_{0}^{3}}{12 (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) v_{ψ})} [\{1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\} {\{1 + β (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}})\}}^{3}],

7

D_{ψ} = \frac{E_{2} h_{0}^{3}}{12 (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) v_{ψ})} [\{1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\} {\{1 + β (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ}{a}})\}}^{3}],

8

D_{ξ ψ} = \frac{G_{0} h_{0}^{3}}{12} [\{1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\} {\{1 + β (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}})\}}^{3}],

9

D_{1} = \frac{E_{1} h_{0}^{3} ν_{ψ}}{12 (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) v_{ψ})} [\{1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\} {\{1 + β (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}})\}}^{3}],

Now, introducing non-dimensional variable as:

10

E_{1}^{*} = \frac{E_{1}}{1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) ν_{ψ}}, E_{2}^{*} = \frac{E_{2}}{1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) ν_{ψ}}, E^{*} = ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) E_{2}^{*} = ν_{ψ} E_{1}^{*} .

The equation for kinetic energy $T_{s}$ and strain energy $V_{s}$ for natural transverse vibration of non-uniform orthotropic parallelogram is taken as in [1]:

11

T_{s} = \frac{1}{2} ω^{2} \int_{0}^{a} ‍ \int_{0}^{b} ‍ ρ l Φ^{2} c o s θ d ξ d ψ,

12

V_{s} = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{a} ‍ \int_{0}^{b} ‍ [D_{ξ} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}})}^{2} + D_{ψ} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}} {t a n}^{2} θ - 2 \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ} t a n θ s e c θ + \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ψ^{2}} {s e c}^{2} θ)}^{2}

+ 2 D_{1} (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}}) (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}} {t a n}^{2} θ + 2 \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ} t a n θ s e c θ + \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ψ^{2}} {s e c}^{2} θ)

+ 4 D_{ξ ψ} {(- \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}} t a n θ + \frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ} s e c θ)}^{2}] c o s θ d ξ d ψ .

Rayleigh-Ritz method requires that maximum strain energy must be equal to maximum kinetic energy i.e.,:

13

J = δ (V_{s} - T_{s}) = 0 .

From Eqs. (1), (6-9), we have:

14

J = \int_{0}^{a} ‍ \int_{0}^{b} ‍ [\{\{1 - α (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\} {\{(1 + β Υ_{1})\}}^{3}\} \{{c o s}^{4} θ + \frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} {s i n}^{4} θ + 2 ν_{ψ} {s i n}^{2} θ {c o s}^{2} θ\} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}})}^{2} + \{4 \frac{G_{0}}{E_{1}} (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) ν_{ψ}) {s i n}^{2} θ {c o s}^{2} θ\} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}})}^{2} + \frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ψ^{2}})}^{2} + 4 \{\frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} {s i n}^{2} θ + \frac{G_{0}}{E_{1}} (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) ν_{ψ}) {c o s}^{2} θ\} {(\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ})}^{2} + 2 \{\frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} {s i n}^{2} θ + ν_{ψ} {c o s}^{2} θ\} (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}}) (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ψ^{2}}) - 4 \{\frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} {s i n}^{3} θ + 2 ν_{ψ} s i n θ {c o s}^{2} θ\} (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}}) (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ}) + 2 \{\frac{G_{0}}{E_{1}} (1 - ν_{ξ_{0}} (1 - m Υ_{1}) ν_{ψ}) s i n θ {c o s}^{2} θ\} (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ^{2}}) (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ})

- 4 \{\frac{E_{2}}{E_{1}} s i n θ\} (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ψ^{2}}) (\frac{\partial^{2} Φ}{\partial ξ \partial ψ})] d ξ d ψ - λ^{2} \int_{0}^{a} ‍ \int_{0}^{b} ‍ [(1 - m Υ_{1}) (1 + β Υ_{1})] Φ^{2} d ξ d ψ,

where $λ^{2} = \frac{12 ρ_{0} a^{2} {c o s}^{5} θ}{E_{1}^{*} h_{0}^{2}}$ , $Υ_{1} = (1 - \sqrt{1 - \frac{ξ^{2}}{a^{2}}}) .$

The two term deflection function which satisfy all the edge conditions can be taken as in [7] The two term deflection function which satisfy all the edge conditions can be taken as in [7]:

15

Φ (ξ, ψ) = [{(\frac{ξ}{a})}^{e} {(\frac{ψ}{b})}^{f} {(1 - \frac{ξ}{a})}^{g} {(1 - \frac{ψ}{b})}^{h}] \times [\sum_{i = 0}^{N} ‍ Ω_{i} {\{(\frac{ξ}{a}) (\frac{ψ}{b}) (1 - \frac{ξ}{a}) (1 - \frac{ψ}{b})\}}^{i}] .

This expression results from two components: one defining boundary conditions (0 for free edge, 1 for simply supported, 2 for clamped edge), and the other representing mode frequencies with constants $Ω_{i}$ for $i = 0,1, 2, \dots, N$ . To minimize the functional in Eq. (11), the following condition is necessary:

16

\frac{\partial J}{\partial Ω_{i}} = 0, i = 0,1, 2,3 . . . N .

After simplifying Eq. (13), we get a homogeneous system of equations in $Ω_{i}$ whose non zero solution gives equation of frequency as:

17

|P - λ^{2} Q| = 0,

where, $P = {[p_{i j}]}_{N + 1}$ and $Q = {[q i j]}_{N + 1}$ are square matrices of order $(n + 1)$ with $i = 0,1, 2 . . . N$ and $j = 0,1, 2 . . . N$ . The time period is calculated using the expression:

18

K = \frac{2 π}{λ},

where $λ$ is a frequency obtained from Eq. (14).

3. Numerical results and discussion

This study investigated the impact of parameters such as tapering, thermal gradient, and non-homogeneity on the vibration time period of an orthotropic parallelogram plate. The plate had a fixed aspect ratio of $a / b = 1.5$ , a skew angle of $θ =$ 30°, circular thickness, and Poisson’s ratio. The analysis considered specific edge conditions and linear temperature effects, with material parameters sourced from [5]: $E_{2}^{*} / E_{1}^{*} = 0.01$ , $E^{*} / E_{1}^{*} = 0.3$ , $G_{0} / E_{1}^{*} = 0.0333$ , $E_{1}^{*} / ρ_{0} =$ 3.0×10⁵ and $ν_{ξ_{0}} = 0.345.$ The results are presented in Tables 1-3.

Table 1Time period of orthotropic parallelogram plate at SCCC edge condition corresponding to non-homogeneity parameter m

	$m$	$α$ = 0.2
		$β$ = 0.0		$β$ = 0.2		$β$ = 0.4		$β$ = 0.6		$β$ = 0.8
		$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$
SCCC	0.0	0.44915	0.07578	0.44001	0.07564	0.43034	0.07543	0.42022	0.07515	0.40973	0.07480
	0.2	0.44909	0.07577	0.43995	0.07563	0.43027	0.07542	0.42013	0.07515	0.40963	0.07479
	0.4	0.44903	0.07577	0.43989	0.07563	0.43021	0.07542	0.42006	0.07514	0.40954	0.07479
	0.6	0.44897	0.07577	0.43982	0.07563	0.43015	0.07542	0.42000	0.07514	0.40948	0.07479
	0.8	0.44893	0.07577	0.43976	0.07563	0.43005	0.07542	0.41991	0.07514	0.40938	0.07478

Table 2Time period of orthotropic parallelogram plate at SCCC edge condition corresponding to thermal gradient α

	$α$	$m$ = 0.2
		$β$ = 0.0		$β$ = 0.2		$β$ = 0.4		$β$ = 0.6		$β$ = 0.8
		$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$
SCCC	0.0	0.43238	0.07212	0.42396	0.07202	0.41501	0.07186	0.40564	0.07163	0.39594	0.07134
	0.2	0.44909	0.07577	0.43995	0.07563	0.43027	0.07542	0.42013	0.07515	0.40963	0.07479
	0.4	0.46807	0.08004	0.45808	0.07985	0.44752	0.07958	0.43643	0.07923	0.42500	0.07880
	0.6	0.48996	0.08512	0.47894	0.08485	0.46725	0.08450	0.45503	0.08406	0.44240	0.08352
	0.8	0.51573	0.09130	0.50335	0.09093	0.49022	0.09046	0.47655	0.08989	0.46247	0.08921

Table 3Time period of orthotropic parallelogram plate at SCCC edge condition corresponding to tapering parameter β

	$β$	$m = α = 0.0$		$m = α = 0.2$		$m = α = 0.4$		$m = α = 0.6$		$m = α = 0.8$
	$β$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$	$K_{2}$	$K_{1}$
SCCC	0.0	0.43244	0.07213	0.44909	0.07577	0.46800	0.08004	0.48984	0.08511	0.51551	0.09129
	0.2	0.42402	0.07202	0.43995	0.07563	0.45801	0.07985	0.47878	0.08485	0.50310	0.09092
	0.4	0.41510	0.07186	0.43027	0.07542	0.44743	0.07958	0.46706	0.08450	0.48996	0.09045
	0.6	0.40574	0.07163	0.42013	0.07515	0.43637	0.07923	0.45484	0.08405	0.47627	0.08988
	0.8	0.39600	0.07134	0.40963	0.07479	0.42490	0.07880	0.44221	0.08352	0.46216	0.08920

Table 1 presents time period data for an orthotropic parallelogram plate under the $S C C C$ edge condition and a constant thermal gradient ( $α = 0.2$ ). The table covers a range of non-homogeneity parameter ( $m$ ) and tapering parameter ( $β$ ) values from 0.0 to 0.8. The results show that higher $β$ values lead to a decrease in time period $K$ , similar to the effect of increasing $m$ on reducing $K$ .

Table 2 exhibits time period ( $K$ ) data for an orthotropic parallelogram plate under the $S C C C$ edge condition, with a constant non-homogeneity parameter ( $m = 0.2$ ). The table encompasses $β$ and $α$ values from 0.0 to 0.8. Remarkably, higher thermal gradient ( $α$ ) values result in elevated time period ( $K$ ), while increasing the tapering parameter ( $β$ ) leads to a significant decrease in $K$ .

Table 3 presents time periods for an orthotropic parallelogram plate under the $S C C C$ edge condition, with variable non-homogeneity ( $m$ ), thermal gradient ( $α$ ), and tapering ( $β$ ) parameters ranging from 0.0 to 0.8. Higher values of $α$ and $m$ lead to an increase in the time period ( $K$ ), while raising $β$ results in a reduction of $K$ .

4. Conclusions

In terms of time periods, Table 1 indicates that $β$ holds greater influence than $m$ under the $S C C C$ edge condition. Additionally, in Tables 2 and 3, $β$ demonstrates a more substantial effect on the time period’s rate of change compared to $α$ and $m$ , respectively.

References

A.W. Leissa, “Vibration of plates scientific and technical information division,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1969.

Search CrossRef
M. Di Sciuva, “Bending, vibration and buckling of simply supported thick multilayered orthotropic plates: An evaluation of a new displacement model,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 105, No. 3, pp. 425–442, Mar. 1986, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(86)90169-0

Publisher
A. K. Gupta and Mamta, “Effect of exponential temperature variation on frequencies of a rectangular plate of non-linear varying thickness,” American Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019.

Search CrossRef
A. K. Gupta, A. Kumar, and H. Kaur, “Vibration of visco-elastic orthotropic parallelogram plate with linear thickness variation in both directions,” International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, Vol. 2, pp. 72–80, 2011.

Search CrossRef
A. K. Gupta, A. Kumar, and D. V. Gupta, “Vibration of visco-elastic orthotropic parallelogram plate with parabolically thickness variation,” Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 61–70, 2012.

Search CrossRef
A. Khanna and A. Singhal, “Effect of plate’s parameters on vibration of isotropic tapered rectangular plate with different boundary conditions,” Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 139–151, 2016.

Publisher
N. Lather, R. Bhardwaj, A. Sharma, K. Kumar, and A. L. Schiavo, “Time period analysis of orthotropic skew plate with 2-D circular thickness and 1-D circular density,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2022, pp. 1–15, 2022.

Publisher
A. Sharma, “Natural vibration of parallelogram plate with circular variation in density,” Acta Technica, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 763–774, 2018.

Search CrossRef
A. Sharma, A. Raghav, and V. Kumar, “Mathematical study of vibration on non-homogeneous parallelogram plate with thermal gradient,” International Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2016.

Search CrossRef
A. K. Sharma and M. K. Dhiman, “Vibration analysis of simply supported parallelogram plate with bi-dimensional thickness and temperature deviation,” International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol. 6, No. 12, 2018.

Search CrossRef
A. K. Sharma and V. Verma, “Inspection of vibration using Rayleigh-Ritz method for orthotropic non-homogeneous plate with varying thickness and thermal effect,” Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2017.

Search CrossRef
A. K. Sharma, M. K. Dhiman, H. Singh, P. Prashar, and P. Sharma, “Effect of non-homogeneity with thickness and temperature variation on vibration of orthotropic parallelogram plate with simply supported edges.,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 15, pp. 2757–2762, 2006.

Search CrossRef

About this article

Received

31 October 2023

Accepted

11 November 2023

Published

27 November 2023

SUBJECTS

Modal analysis and applications

DOI

https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23758

Keywords

orthotropic parallelogram plate

thermal gradient

circular tapering

nonhomogeneity

Acknowledgements

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Previous article in issue Previous Next article in issue Next

Research article

2019 03 15

Modelling on vibration of skew plate with thickness and temperature variation

Reeta Bhardwaj, Naveen Mani

Research article

2019 03 15

Natural vibration of skew plate on different set of boundary conditions with temperature gradient

Neeraj Lather, Amit Sharma

Research article

2018 05 15

Effect of density and Poisson’s ratio on thermal induced vibration of parallelogram plate

Amit Sharma, Ashish Kumar Sharma, Vijay Kumar

Research article

2016 12 31

Analysis of free vibration of non-homogenous trapezoidal plate with 2D varying thickness and thermal effect

Ashish Kumar Sharma, Amit Sharma, A. K. Raghav, Vijay Kumar

Sapna and A. Sharma, “Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates,” Vibroengineering Procedia, Vol. 53, pp. 65–70, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23758

Copy Extrica

Copied to clipboard!

TY  - JOUR
DO  - 10.21595/vp.2023.23758
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23758
TI  - Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates
T2  - Vibroengineering Procedia
AU  - Sapna
AU  - Sharma, Amit
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/11/27
PB  - JVE International Ltd.
SP  - 65-70
VL  - 53
SN  - 2345-0533
SN  - 2538-8479
ER  - 

Copy Ris

Copied to clipboard!

 @article{Sapna_2023, title={Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates}, volume={53}, ISSN={2538-8479}, url={https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23758}, DOI={10.21595/vp.2023.23758}, journal={Vibroengineering Procedia}, publisher={JVE International Ltd.}, author={Sapna and Sharma, Amit}, year={2023}, month=nov, pages={65–70} }

Copy Bibtex

Copied to clipboard!

[1]Sapna and A. Sharma, “Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates,” Vibroengineering Procedia, vol. 53, pp. 65–70, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.21595/vp.2023.23758.

Copy IEEE

Copied to clipboard!

Sapna, and Amit Sharma. “Analyzing Vibration Modes in Non-Homogeneous Parallelogram Plates.” Vibroengineering Procedia 53 (November 27, 2023): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2023.23758.

Copy Chicago

Copied to clipboard!

Analyzing vibration modes in non-homogeneous parallelogram plates

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Geometry and analytical approach

3. Numerical results and discussion

4. Conclusions

References

About this article

Related Articles